Nagoya (@1.95) vs Oita (@3.7)

Our Prediction:

Nagoya will win

Nagoya – Oita Match Prediction | 06-10-2019 01:00

In some rare cases, the teams that have not won the same number of wins may be matched, for the sake of other tournament requirements: the number of Affirmative/Negative rounds each team should debate on should be the same, opponent of the previous rounds will not be matched again, and teams from the same school will not have a match against each other.

In that case, a judge should compare the ADs and the DAs rationally, using ones own value judgments. If the ADs outweigh the DAs then AFF wins, else the NEG wins. (For example, AFF insisted that each child should have enough math ability but NEG argued that childrens individuality should have priority. If a team has explained the value criteria for deciding whether the ADs outweigh the DAs, such debaters criteria should be used to determine the winner. Try to avoid your own point of view coming in. Recollect the latter stage speeches (summary) of the debaters. Which is more important? Such comparison should be done by the debatersthemselves. In some debates, neither team is able to present such value criterion effectively. If the NEG can not present a counter-criterion, a judge should decide in favor of the AFF). 5.Compare the net sum of the issues:Sum up the strength of the ADs and consider if it outweighs the strength of the summed-up DAs. A good AFF summary may present a value criterion insisting that their plan can meet the necessary civil minimum concerning math ability, and the value of such necessary ability outweighs the vague individuality value.

Hi I am going to be in Osaka from 7th April -8th April and in Kyoto from 9th April till 13th April. Would I be able catch some part of Cherry blossom or would it be too late? Thanks vm. Should I consider going to Mt Yoshino or Hikone to view Cherry blossom?any suggestion on day trip from Kyoto to view Cherry blossom is most welcome.

If such hasty rebuttals are apparently seen, Judges should ignore them. The Affirmative Attack speaker is not allowed to refute the attacks of Negative Attack speech. Only when the Negative Constructive speech contains attacks to the Affirmative Advantages, the Affirmative Attack speaker is allowed to refute to the attacks in the Constructive speech. Such rebuttal should be done in the Defense speech.

in All Japan High School English Debate Tournament in Gifu

(Before any punishment, the Judging committee will inquire and let the member or coach make some explanation. The debaters are never allowed to make a complaint or protest against the judges decision after the debate is over. The same applies to, for example, new arguments in the final speech. If debaters or coaches do protest excessively, the team may be penalized, possibly losing the qualification for the finals, the best debaters award, or even banned from future tournaments.

The duration of each speech will be kept track of by each rooms official Time Keepers timer, not the timers of the debaters. Only when there is some apparent accident in time measurement, such as when the Time Keepers timer broke down or the Time Keeper mishandled the timer, the main judge may refer to the debaters timer.

Do not ask this match as a free match,all e-mails will be rejected !!! To ensure all my paying members are treated with respect, we do not provide any free trial HT/FT fixed matches under any circumstances. So we rather take good care of those who appreciate my services! 90% of those who request for free trial tips do not have the intentions to purchase matches.

In the Dutch system, the patient is not required to be in the terminal stage of ones illness.

However, The Plan cannot solve the problem effectively, because the Government is technically unable to spend the cost that much may be a valid attack on the Advantage. *In some cases it is difficult to draw a clear line between attacks and Disadvantages. For example, arguments like It costs a lot to carry out their plan are in fact Disadvantages, so it shouldnt be mentioned in the Attack speech.


In the Questions and Answers sections, the questioner directly converse with the answerer. In the Questions and Answers section, the questioner team has the right to proceed. The questions can either be 1) confirmations on ambiguous point, or 2) examinations of arguments or evidence. Which means, the questioner can move on to the next question if the answerer is taking too much time to answer, or the answers does not correspond to the question. The answerer is expected to give speedy and precise answers. The questioner must ask questions on the opponents last speech, using interrogative sentences.

We guaranteed for making fast cash and change your life forever. Thank you for visiting our best football website.On our site you will find reliable football bets and 100% sure fixed matches. There are a lot of football costumers from all over the world, who are differently less or more actively football bettors.To make your life easier we have develop a strong soccer prediction engine that is saving a lot of time for you in case you would search the best prediction by yourself.

Also they do not have to argue on how it will be achieved. They do not have to prove that such situation will surely be achieved. The Affirmative teams should defend the hypothetical situation where most of the universities start their academic year around September. The Negative team should not, for example, attack that the majority of universities will not shift the beginning of their academic year to September. This assumption should not be challenged. The debate, for the sake of arguments, should take for granted (as a hypothetical premise) that such situation can be achieved.

Judges should pick a debater that has contributed most to her/his team, not the lone player type who just shows off without contributing to the team. If the votes are equal, the debater from the team with better final result will be awarded. In every preliminary and the final rounds, each judge must (independently, without discussing with other judges) vote for one debater as the candidate of the best debater award in that specific round. Judges may choose from either the winning or losing team. All votes from the preliminaries to the Final round are counted. The excellent debater awards are awarded to the debaters with the highest number of accumulated votes from the judges.

The BI provides income basically only to the Japanese nation. Such assistance should be assumed as being continued. Now, exceptionally for humane reasons, some local autonomies provide livelihood assistance to alien denizens living in poverty. The affirmative side can define whether the minors should receive the same amount as the adults, but other restrictions toward the payments should not be argued (such as, BI should not be provided to the rich).